Jump to content

St. Louis Cardinals trade RHP Shelby Miller & RHP Tyrell Jenkins to the Braves for OF Jason Heyward


Greg

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>St. Louis Cardinals trade RHP Shelby Miller & RHP Tyrell Jenkins to the Braves for OF Jason Heyward & RHP Jordan Walden.</p>— St. Louis Cardinals (@Cardinals) <a href="

">November 17, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting trade.. a 23 yo starting pitcher who has already completed 2 full years in the majors for 24 yo outfielder who amazingly has 5 full years in the majors.

I usually say never give up young cost controlled starting pitching, but I think Heyward is going to get better, where Miller may just be a #5 innings eater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting trade.. a 23 yo starting pitcher who has already completed 2 full years in the majors for 24 yo outfielder who amazingly has 5 full years in the majors.

I usually say never give up young cost controlled starting pitching, but I think Heyward is going to get better, where Miller may just be a #5 innings eater.

Or neither one may really contribute under the current contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an issue with Heyward. I think of who it looked like he might become instead of who he actually is.
I just realized that Heyward and Markakis both have similar offensive numbers

Honestly, I think it's a combination of this and the fact that he's closer to FA. They just added a lot of team-controlled years out of the two guys they picked up.

Not that I dislike Heyward, but nothing about his numbers jumps out at me and says, "I need to pay this guy." Much like Markakis, it's not a matter of "Do I want to keep him." It's, "Do I really wanna pay this guy top dollar for what I'm getting out of him?"

Just my opinion, but it looks like they used a guy who they would have let walk in FA anyway and used him to fill a rotation spot for the next years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an issue with Heyward. I think of who it looked like he might become instead of who he actually is.

That being said I know the Braves are desperate for pitching but this isn't much of a haul.

Maybe they are also freeing up salary.

I think that your last sentence is right. They get 4 years of Miller, shed 10M or whatever Heyward was going to get this year, and he's a FA after the 2015 season. They keep saying he's 25, but my guess is 35. That guy just looks old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 years of Miller > 1 year of Heyward

Miller isn't very good. 2014: 4.54FIP 4.47xFIP 4.60SIERA.His K rate dropped by 2.5K/9 to an uninspired 6.29K/9. His walked rate increases from 2.96 to 3.59. I'll take one year of stud player when I'm trying to win a WS over 4 years of mediocre starter living off his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miller isn't very good. 2014: 4.54FIP 4.47xFIP 4.60SIERA.His K rate dropped by 2.5K/9 to an uninspired 6.29K/9. His walked rate increases from 2.96 to 3.59. I'll take one year of stud player when I'm trying to win a WS over 4 years of mediocre starter living off his name.

Except Hayward hasn't performed like a stud player, and Miller has - with a 3.33 career ERA - turning 24 in Ocotober - despite going through a sophomore slump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except Hayward hasn't performed like a stud player, and Miller has - with a 3.33 career ERA - turning 24 in Ocotober - despite going through a sophomore slump.

5-6 WAR last season is stud like.

Of course a lot of that value is on defense and that makes a large percentage of fan's discount it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I think it’s white people problems to worry about the inconsistent quality of the Negro Leagues. The black ball players lived with a far more consistent worse. Seems a minor reconciliation to combine the stats.
    • Yes, he'll be in the Hall.  He will be looked at one of the better hitters of his era.   I also think the whole WAR argument about certain players is silly, it's certainly silly against Soto.  Like, no one wants to watch Juan Soto because he's a great defender.  No one advertises that as part of his game, no one pretends he is a great defender...so why's that held against him, exactly?  Because WAR?  "Oh, WAR says he's not a great defender, he doesn't bring enough value with the glove so he's not as valuable as this guy and wah wah wah, whine, whine whine..." It's such a lazy argument that doesn't tell the whole story, that Juan Soto hit for a 1.178 OPS in the World Series at 20 years old.  It doesn't tell the whole story that he's one of the brightest, youngest stars in a game that desperately needs bright young stars and still can't figure out how to market them.  WAR doesn't tell the whole story for a guy like Soto just like it didn't for a guy like Ichiro, just like it didn't for Tony Gwynn.  Does anyone want to tell me that Tony Gwynn's greatness and brilliance can simply be boiled down to 69.2 with a straight face? That brings me to Jeter which...I mean, cry about it a little harder, guys.  Near unanimous selection to the Hall of Fame, really?  Yes, Yankees fans still think he was a great defender because jump throws are impressive...everyone else knows he wasn't.  That's our privilege and their delusion. But everyone here also knows that a Hall of Fame vote is an emotional one and that, like it or not, Derek Jeter was one of the prime faces of the MLB during his career in the way that someone like Barry Larkin never was.  It's not Jeter's fault that the Reds aren't the Yankees and that the Reds only won 1 World Series during Larkin's career compared to what Jeter was a part of.   But that's how the cookie crumbles sometimes.
    • If the Yankees move him to SS, he'll be heralded as one of the all time great SS as long as he can make some theatrical dives for the ball.
    • BB-ref did it briefly, then switched back.  I have mixed feelings about it TBH, because I think the overall quality of the Negro Leagues varied a lot from one time period to another, more so than in the majors.   But I’m not a keen student of the Negro Leagues so I’ll leave it to baseball history scholars to debate. 
    • Retirement is the best call he’s made in years. He finally got one right. Way to go, Angel!
    • I was really unhappy with the first two innings but I was pleased to see how he responded to the adversity.  In past games he might have let that snowball.  Instead, he dominated those last four innings.  In fact, I was a little disappointed that Hyde didn’t send him out for the 7th inning, sitting on 90 pitches. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...